The Oxford Test of English will soon be offered at test centers in China and Thailand. Congratulations to the team at OUP! That’s one step closer to my backyard!
China is an interesting case. Regular readers know that the two big English tests in that country – IELTS and TOEFL – are administered in partnership with the NEEA, a public agency associated with the Chinese Ministry of Education. Test registration is done through an NEEA portal. The NEEA collects registration fees and later passes them along to ETS and the British Council… after pocketing an unspecified amount.
This is probably good for test takers as the NEEA is known for blocking price hikes and upselling. It also mandates that registration fees be charged in RMB. It probably isn’t great for testing firms, as the NEEA is known for blocking price hikes and upselling. It also mandates that registration fees be charged in RMB.
Not all language tests are required to operate in partnership with the NEEA. This is because there are two types of language tests in the eyes of the Chinese regime – we might translate them as “educational tests” and “commercial language proficiency exams.” The former must be administered in partnership with the NEEA, while the latter can be administered with any local partner.
The biggest English test to operate without NEEA partnership is the PTE. Pearson partners with an on-shore company called Beijing Ensi (d/b/a Pearson VUE China).
In the case of Oxford, that partner will be a group called GEC.
A funny case is that of Prometric. They run the CELPIP with local partners, but run the CAEL with the NEEA. Which makes sense, as the CAEL is used for educational purposes, while the CELPIP is not.
There is a point to all of this. Anyone who cares enough to still be reading already knows that the IELTS test is run in China through a partnership between the British Council and the NEEA. IDP Education is not involved, but traditionally the British Council paid them a per-test royalty as a sort of booby prize in recognition of their partial ownership of IELTS.
Last year, IDP gave up that royalty and began administering the IELTS themselves. It is my understanding that their strategy was to brand themselves as a provider of a commercial language proficiency exam. This was done with an unnamed local partner referred to by CEO Tennealle O’Shannessy as “a respected professional examination service provider.” Someone once told me the name of that partner, but I’ve long forgotten. I could look it up, if anyone cares.
That went well for a few months. But by December, testing had ceased. IDP is now in negotiations to resume testing. I don’t know how those negotiations are going.
I’ve always wondered how Pearson managed to skirt the NEEA requirement. I know that it is used for both educational and non-educational purposes. Maybe that’s enough. But so are the IELTS and TOEFL tests, to some extent. And, surely, they would like to be free of the NEEA.